Bibliography





Notice:

  • Clicking on the title will open a new window with all details of the bibliographic entry.
  • Clicking on the DOI link will open a new window with the original bibliographic entry from the publisher.
  • Clicking on a single author will show all publications by the selected author.
  • Clicking on a single keyword, will show all publications by the selected keyword.



Found 16 entries in the Bibliography.


Showing entries from 1 through 16


2021

Auroral ionospheric E region parameters obtained from satellite- based far-ultraviolet and ground-based ionosonde observations – effects of proton precipitation

\textlessp\textgreater\textlessstrong class="journal-contentHeaderColor"\textgreaterAbstract.\textless/strong\textgreater Coincident auroral far-ultraviolet (FUV) and ground-based ionosonde observations are compared for the purpose of determining whether auroral FUV remote sensing algorithms that assume pure electron precipitation are biased in the presence of proton precipitation. Auroral particle transport and optical emission models, such as the Boltzmann 3-Constituent (B3C) model, predict that maximum E region electron density (NmE) values derived from auroral Lyman–Birge–Hopfield (LBH) emissions, assuming electron precipitation, will be biased by up to \textlessspan class="inline-formula"\textgreater∼20\textless/span\textgreater \% (high) for pure proton aurora, while comparisons between LBH radiances and radiances derived from in situ particle flux observations (i.e., Knight et al., 2008, 2012) indicate that the bias associated with proton aurora should be much larger. Surprisingly, in the comparisons with ionosonde observations described here, no bias associated with proton aurora is found in FUV-derived auroral NmE, which means that auroral FUV remote sensing methods for NmE are more accurate in the presence of proton precipitation than was suggested in the aforementioned earlier works. Possible explanations for the discrepancy with the earlier results are discussed.\textless/p\textgreater

Knight, Harold;

Published by: Annales Geophysicae      Published on: jan

YEAR: 2021     DOI: 10.5194/angeo-39-105-2021

Auroral ionospheric E region parameters obtained from satellite-based far-ultraviolet and ground-based ionosonde observations—effects of proton precipitation

At the nadir, there are ∼57.5 pixels per averaging area for GUVI and ∼28.5 for SSUSI. Only 0.030 counts per R per averaging area for GUVI, F16 SSUSI, and F18 SSUSI, respectively.

Knight, Harold;

Published by:       Published on:

YEAR: 2021     DOI: 10.5194/angeo-39-105-2021

2018

Auroral Ionospheric E Region Parameters Obtained From Satellite-Based Far Ultraviolet and Ground-Based Ionosonde Observations: Data, Methods, and Comparisons

A large number (~1,000) of coincident auroral far ultraviolet (FUV) and ground-based ionosonde observations are compared. This is the largest study to date of coincident satellite-based FUV and ground-based observations of the auroral E region. FUV radiance values from the NASA Thermosphere, Ionosphere, Mesosphere Energetics and Dynamics Global Ultraviolet Imager and the Defense Meteorological Satellite Program F16 and F18 Special Sensor Ultraviolet Spectrographic Imager are included in the study. A method is described for deriving auroral ionospheric E region maximum electron density (NmE) and height of maximum electron density (hmE) from N2 Lyman-Birge-Hopfield radiances given in two channels using lookup tables generated with the Boltzmann 3-Constituent (B3C) auroral particle transport and optical emission model. Our rules for scaling (i.e., extracting ionospheric parameters from) ionograms to obtain auroral NmE and hmE are also described. Statistical and visual comparison methods establish statistical consistency and agreement between the two methods for observing auroral NmE, but not auroral hmE. It is expected that auroral nonuniformity will cause the two NmE methods to give inconsistent results, but we have not attempted to quantify this effect in terms of more basic principles, and our results show that the two types of NmE observations are well correlated and statistically symmetrical, meaning that there is no overall bias and no scale-dependent bias.

Knight, H.; Galkin, I.; Reinisch, B.; Zhang, Y.;

Published by: Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics      Published on: 06/2018

YEAR: 2018     DOI: 10.1029/2017JA024822

Auroral ionospheric E region parameters obtained from satellite-based far ultraviolet and ground-based ionosonde observations: Data, methods, and comparisons

A large number (~1,000) of coincident auroral far ultraviolet (FUV) and ground-based ionosonde observations are compared. This is the largest study to date of coincident satellite-based FUV and ground-based observations of the auroral E region. FUV radiance values from the NASA Thermosphere, Ionosphere, Mesosphere Energetics and Dynamics Global Ultraviolet Imager and the Defense Meteorological Satellite Program F16 and F18 Special Sensor Ultraviolet Spectrographic Imager are included in the study.

Knight, HK; Galkin, IA; Reinisch, BW; Zhang, Y;

Published by: Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics      Published on:

YEAR: 2018     DOI: 10.1029/2017JA024822

2013

Determining relative proton and electron auroral LBH emission efficiencies from FUV-ionosonde comparisons-preliminary results

Knight, HK; Galkin, IA; Reinisch, BW; Paxton, L;

Published by:       Published on:

YEAR: 2013     DOI:

2012

An empirical determination of proton auroral far ultraviolet emission efficiencies using a new nonclimatological proton flux extrapolation method

Knight, HK; Strickland, DJ; Correira, J; Hecht, JH; Straus, PR;

Published by: Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics      Published on:

YEAR: 2012     DOI:

2011

A downward revision of a recently reported proton auroral LBH emission efficiency

Correira, J; Strickland, DJ; Evans, JS; Knight, HK; Hecht, JH;

Published by: Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics      Published on:

YEAR: 2011     DOI:

2010

A new proton auroral extrapolation method applied in the estimation of FUV emission yields

Knight, HK; Strickland, DJ; Correira, J; Evans, JS; Hecht, JH;

Published by:       Published on:

YEAR: 2010     DOI:

Using FUV remote-sensing methods to investigate solar EUV variability with the aid of TIMED/GUVI observations

Correira, J; Strickland, DJ; Evans, JS; Knight, HK;

Published by:       Published on:

YEAR: 2010     DOI:

Integrating the Sun-Earth System for the Operational Environment (ISES-OE)

Lean, J.; Huba, J.; McDonald, S.; Slinker, S.; Drob, D.; Emmert, J.; Meier, R.; Picone, J.; Joyce, G.; Krall, J.; Stephan, A.; Roach, K.; Knight, H.; Plunkett, S.; Wu, C.-C.; Wood, B.; Wang, Y.-M.; Howard, R.; Chen, J.; Bernhardt, P.; Fedder, J.;

Published by:       Published on:

YEAR: 2010     DOI:

2008

Evidence for significantly greater N2 Lyman-Birge-Hopfield emission efficiencies in proton versus electron aurora based on analysis of coincident DMSP SSUSI and SSJ/5 data

Knight, HK; Strickland, DJ; Hecht, JH; Straus, PR; Morrison, D; Paxton, LJ; Evans, DS;

Published by: Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics      Published on:

YEAR: 2008     DOI:

2007

Constraining and validating the Oct/Nov 2003 X-class EUV flare enhancements with observations of FUV dayglow and E -region electron densities

Strickland, D.; Lean, J.; Daniell, R.; Knight, H.; Woo, W.; Meier, R.; Straus, P.; Woods, T.; Eparvier, F.; McMullin, D.; Christensen, A.; Morrison, D.; Paxton, L.;

Published by: Journal of Geophysical Research      Published on: Jan-01-2007

YEAR: 2007     DOI: 10.1029/2006JA012074

Constraining and validating the Oct/Nov 2003 X-class EUV flare enhancements with observations of FUV dayglow and E-region electron densities

Strickland, DJ; Lean, JL; , Daniell; Knight, HK; Woo, WK; Meier, RR; Straus, PR; Woods, TN; Eparvier, FG; McMullin, DR; , others;

Published by: Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics      Published on:

YEAR: 2007     DOI:

2005

Auroral-E electron density profiles to be derived from SESS particle data

Evans, JS; Daniell, RE; Knight, H; Strickland, DJ; Rodriguez, JV;

Published by:       Published on:

YEAR: 2005     DOI:

Near Simultaneous Observations of the Aurora From FUV, Particle and Photometric Instruments on DMSP-F16, TIMED, and IMAGE

Hecht, JH; Strickland, DJ; Knight, HK; Kochenash, AJ; Zhang, Y; Morrison, MD; Paxton, LJ; Mende, SB; Frey, HU; Burke, WJ; , others;

Published by:       Published on:

YEAR: 2005     DOI:

Testing Auroral Far Ultraviolet (FUV) Remote Sensing Techniques Using Coincident FUV and Particle Data From the DMSP F16 Satellite

Knight, HK; Strickland, DJ; Kochenash, AJ; Hecht, JH; Morrison, D; Zhang, Y; Paxton, LJ; Burke, WJ; Rich, FJ;

Published by:       Published on:

YEAR: 2005     DOI:



  1