Bibliography
Notice:
|
Found 6 entries in the Bibliography.
Showing entries from 1 through 6
2021 |
Progresses and Challenges to specifying the IT system during weak storms Deng, Yue; Heelis, Roderick; Paxton, Larry; Lyons, Larry; Nishimura, Toshi; Zhang, Shunrong; Bristow, Bill; Maute, Astrid; Sheng, Cheng; Zhu, Qingyu; , others; Published by: Published on: |
Recent attention has been given to mesoscale phenomena across geospace (∼10 s km to 500 km in the ionosphere or ∼0.5 RE to several RE in the magnetosphere), as their contributions to the system global response are important yet remain uncharacterized mostly due to limitations in data resolution and coverage as well as in computational power. As data and models improve, it becomes increasingly valuable to advance understanding of the role of mesoscale phenomena contributions—specifically, in magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling. This paper describes a new method that utilizes the 2D array of Time History of Events and Macroscale Interactions during Substorms (THEMIS) white-light all-sky-imagers (ASI), in conjunction with meridian scanning photometers, to estimate the auroral scale sizes of intense precipitating energy fluxes and the associated Hall conductances. As an example of the technique, we investigated the role of precipitated energy flux and average energy on mesoscales as contrasted to large-scales for two back-to-back substorms, finding that mesoscale aurora contributes up to ∼80\% (∼60\%) of the total energy flux immediately after onset during the early expansion phase of the first (second) substorm, and continues to contribute ∼30–55\% throughout the remainder of the substorm. The average energy estimated from the ASI mosaic field of view also peaked during the initial expansion phase. Using the measured energy flux and tables produced from the Boltzmann Three Constituent (B3C) auroral transport code (Strickland et al., 1976; 1993), we also estimated the 2D Hall conductance and compared it to Poker Flat Incoherent Scatter Radar conductance values, finding good agreement for both discrete and diffuse aurora. Gabrielse, Christine; Nishimura, Toshi; Chen, Margaret; Hecht, James; Kaeppler, Stephen; Gillies, Megan; Reimer, Ashton; Lyons, Larry; Deng, Yue; Donovan, Eric; Evans, Scott; Published by: Frontiers in Physics Published on: |
2019 |
Nishimura, Toshi; Paxton, Larry; Lyons, Larry; Erickson, Philip; Published by: Published on: |
2018 |
Lyons, LR; Gallardo-Lacourt, B; Zou, Y; Nishimura, Y; Anderson, P; , Angelopoulos; Donovan, EF; Ruohoniemi, JM; Mitchell, E; Paxton, LJ; , others; Published by: Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics Published on: |
2017 |
Driving of Dramatic Geomagnetic Activity by Enhancement of Meso-Scale Polar-cap Flows Lyons, Larry; Gallardo-Lacourt, Bea; Zou, Ying; Nishimura, Yukitoshi; Anderson, Phillip; Angelopoulos, VASSILIS; Ruohoniemi, Michael; Mitchell, Elizabeth; Paxton, Larry; Nishitani, Nozomu; Published by: Published on: |
2015 |
Electron precipitation models in global magnetosphere simulations General methods for improving the specification of electron precipitation in global simulations are described and implemented in the Lyon-Fedder-Mobarry (LFM) global simulation model, and the quality of its predictions for precipitation is assessed. LFM\textquoterights existing diffuse and monoenergetic electron precipitation models are improved, and new models are developed for lower energy, broadband, and direct-entry cusp precipitation. The LFM simulation results for combined diffuse plus monoenergetic electron precipitation exhibit a quadratic increase in the hemispheric precipitation power as the intensity of solar wind driving increases, in contrast with the prediction from the OVATION Prime (OP) 2010 empirical precipitation model which increases linearly with driving intensity. Broadband precipitation power increases approximately linearly with driving intensity in both models. Comparisons of LFM and OP predictions with estimates of precipitating power derived from inversions of Polar satellite UVI images during a double substorm event (28\textendash29 March 1998) show that the LFM peak precipitating power is \>4\texttimes larger when using the improved precipitation model and most closely tracks the larger of three different inversion estimates. The OP prediction most closely tracks the double peaks in the intermediate inversion estimate, but it overestimates the precipitating power between the two substorms by a factor \>2 relative to all other estimates. LFMs polar pattern of precipitating energy flux tracks that of OP for broadband precipitation exhibits good correlation with duskside region 1 currents for monoenergetic energy flux that OP misses and fails to produce sufficient diffuse precipitation power in the prenoon quadrant that is present in OP. The prenoon deficiency is most likely due to the absence of drift kinetic physics in the LFM simulation. Zhang, B.; Lotko, W.; Brambles, O.; Wiltberger, M.; Lyon, J.; Published by: Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics Published on: 02/2015 YEAR: 2015   DOI: 10.1002/2014JA020615 electron precipitation; global magnetosphere simulation; magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling |
1