Bibliography
Notice:
|
Found 58 entries in the Bibliography.
Showing entries from 51 through 58
2006 |
Ionospheric behavior during the first few hours of intense geomagnetic storms Mannucci, Anthony; Crowley, Geoff; Tsurutani, Bruce; Fuller-Rowell, Tim; Published by: Published on: |
2005 |
Global patterns of Joule heating in the high-latitude ionosphere A compiled empirical global Joule heating (CEJH) model is described in this study. This model can be used to study Joule heating patterns, Joule heating power, potential drop, and polar potential size in the high-latitude ionosphere and thermosphere, and their variations with solar wind conditions, geomagnetic activities, the solar EUV radiation, and the neutral wind. It is shown that the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) orientation and its magnitude, the solar wind speed, AL index, geomagnetic Kp index, and solar radio flux F10.7 index are important parameters that control Joule heating patterns, Joule heating power, potential drop, and polar potential size. Other parameters, such as the solar wind number density (Nsw) and Earth\textquoterights dipole tilt, do not significantly affect these quantities. It is also shown that the neutral wind can increase or reduce the Joule heating production, and its effectiveness mainly depends on the IMF orientation and its magnitude, the solar wind speed, AL index, Kp index, and F10.7 index. Our results indicate that for less disturbed solar wind conditions, the increase or reduction of the neutral wind contribution to the Joule heating is not significant compared to the convection Joule heating, whereas under extreme solar wind conditions, the neutral wind can significantly contribute to the Joule heating. Application of the CEJH model to the 16 July 2000 storm implies that the model outputs are basically consistent with the results from the AMIE mapping procedure. The CEJH model can be used to examine large-scale energy deposition during disturbed solar wind conditions and to study the dependence of the hemispheric Joule heating on the level of geomagnetic activities and the intensity of solar EUV radiation. This investigation enables us to predict global Joule heating patterns for other models in the high-latitude ionosphere and thermosphere in the sense of space weather forecasting. Zhang, X.; Wang, C.; Chen, T.; Wang, Y.; Tan, A.; Wu, T.; Germany, G.; Wang, W.; Published by: Journal of Geophysical Research Published on: 12*2005 YEAR: 2005   DOI: 10.1029/2005JA011222 electric fields; magnetosphere/ionosphere interaction; Modeling and forecasting; particle precipitation; polar cap ionosphere; solar radiation and cosmic ray effects |
Some of the most intense solar flares measured in 0.1 to 0.8 nm x-rays in recent history occurred near the end of 2003. The Nov 4 event is the largest in the NOAA records (X28) and the Oct 28 flare was the fourth most intense (X17). The Oct 29 flare was class X7. These flares are compared and contrasted to the July 14, 2000 Bastille Day (X10) event using the SOHO SEM 26.0 to 34.0 nm EUV and TIMED SEE 0.1\textendash194 nm data. High time resolution, \~30s ground-base GPS data and the GUVI FUV dayglow data are used to examine the flare-ionosphere relationship. In the 26.0 to 34.0 nm wavelength range, the Oct 28 flare is found to have a peak intensity greater than twice that of the Nov 4 flare, indicating strong spectral variability from flare-to-flare. Solar absorption of the EUV portion of the Nov 4 limb event is a possible cause. The dayside ionosphere responds dramatically (\~2.5 min 1/e rise time) to the x-ray and EUV input by an abrupt increase in total electron content (TEC). The Oct 28 TEC ionospheric peak enhancement at the subsolar point is \~25 TECU (25 \texttimes 1012 electrons/cm2) or 30\% above background. In comparison, the Nov 4, Oct 29 and the Bastille Day events have \~5\textendash7 TECU peak enhancements above background. The Oct 28 TEC enhancement lasts \~3 hrs, far longer than the flare duration. This latter ionospheric feature is consistent with increased electron production in the middle altitude ionosphere, where recombination rates are low. It is the EUV portion of the flare spectrum that is responsible for photoionization of this region. Further modeling will be necessary to fully understand the detailed physics and chemistry of flare-ionosphere coupling. Tsurutani, B.; Judge, D.; Guarnieri, F.; Gangopadhyay, P.; Jones, A.; Nuttall, J.; Zambon, G.A.; Didkovsky, L.; Mannucci, A.J.; Iijima, B.; Meier, R.; Immel, T.J.; Woods, T.; Prasad, S.; Floyd, L.; Huba, J.; Solomon, S.; Straus, P.; Viereck, R.; Published by: Geophysical Research Letters Published on: 02/2005 YEAR: 2005   DOI: 10.1029/2004GL021475 |
Tsurutani, BT; Judge, DL; Meier, RR; Immel, TJ; Woods, TN; Published by: Geophysical research letters Published on: |
2004 |
Tsurutani, B; Flare, Extreme; Team, Ionospheric; Published by: Published on: |
Magnetotail behavior during storm time “sawtooth injections” Lui, ATY; Hori, T; Ohtani, S; Zhang, Y; Zhou, XY; Henderson, MG; Mukai, T; Hayakawa, H; Mende, SB; Published by: Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics Published on: |
2003 |
Storm-time ion pressure distribution of the inner magnetosphere Brandt, PC; Roelof, EC; DeMajistre, R; Lui, AT; Mitchell, DG; Anderson, BJ; Ohtani, S; Fok, M-C; Published by: Published on: |
2002 |
Substorm Local Time and Compositional Characteristics During the April, 2002 Geomagnetic Storms Mitchell, DG; Ohtani, S; Roelof, EC; DeMajistre, R; Reeves, G; Henderson, M; Skoug, R; Borovsky, J; , others; Published by: Published on: |
1 2