Global UltraViolet Imager

Photoelectron flux variations observed from the FAST satellite

<p>This paper examines high resolution (Δ<em>E</em>/<em>E</em>\&nbsp;=\&nbsp;0.15) photoelectron energy spectra from 10\&nbsp;eV to 1\&nbsp;keV, created by solar irradiances between 1.2 and 120\&nbsp;nm. The observations were made from the FAST satellite at \~3000\&nbsp;km, equatorward of the auroral oval for the July\textendashAugust, 2002 solar rotation. These data are compared with the solar irradiance observed by the Solar EUV Experiment (SEE) on the Thermosphere Ionosphere Mesosphere Energetics and Dynamics (TIMED) satellite and fluxes calculated using the Field Line Interhemispheric Plasma (FLIP) code. The 41\&nbsp;eV photoelectron flux, which corresponds to solar EUV fluxes near 20\&nbsp;nm, shows a clear solar rotation variation in very good agreement with the EUV flux measurements. This offers the possibility that the 41\&nbsp;eV photoelectron flux could be used as a check on measured solar EUV fluxes near 20\&nbsp;nm. Because of unexpected noise, the solar rotation signal is not evident in the integral photoelectron flux between 156 and 1000\&nbsp;eV corresponding to EUV wavelengths between 0.1 and 7\&nbsp;nm measured by the SEE instrument. Examination of daily averaged photoelectron fluxes at energies between 25 and 500\&nbsp;eV show significant changes in the photoelectron spectra in response X and M class flares. The intensity of photoelectrons produced in this energy region is primarily due to two very narrow EUV wavelength regions at 2.3 and 3\&nbsp;nm driving Auger photoionization in O at 500\&nbsp;eV and N<sub>2</sub>\&nbsp;at \~360\&nbsp;eV. Comparison of calculated and daily averaged electron fluxes shows that the HEUVAC model solar spectrum used in the FLIP code does not reproduce the observed variations in photoelectron intensity. In principle, the 21 discrete photoelectron energy channels could be used to improve the reliability of the solar EUV fluxes at 2.3 and 3\&nbsp;nm inferred from broad band observations. In practice, orbital biases in the way the data were accumulated and/or noise signals arising from natural and anthropogenic longitudinally restricted sources of ionization complicate the application of this technique.</p>
Year of Publication
Advances in Space Research
Number of Pages
Date Published
ISSN Number